Global nature conservation indicators missing the mark

New Deakin research has set out a roadmap for global conservation efforts, arguing that while the world is in the grips of a biodiversity extinction crisis, international targets to address the problem aren’t addressing the main influences – government and society.

The research, published today in the journal ‘Nature Ecology & Evolution’, puts forward a new ‘biodiversity-crisis hierarchy’ which serves as a blueprint for how humans should evaluate what is driving the sixth mass extinction of life on Earth.

Lead author Professor Don Driscoll, Director of Deakin University’s Centre for Integrative Ecology (CIE), said a major re-think was critical as the deadline for the Convention on Biological Diversity’s 2020 targets loomed.

“The majority of the targets won’t be met. To do better from here on, we need to pay attention to all of the causes of biodiversity loss, especially the big ones,” Professor Driscoll said.

At the beginning of this decade, 196 nations signed on to the Convention’s Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020, considered to be the central pillar of the world’s conservation commitment.

“Biodiversity decline is accelerating despite this agreement,” Professor Driscoll said.

[testimonial_text]Right now, many of the key drivers of biodiversity loss are either poorly evaluated or entirely lacking indicators.[/testimonial_text]
[testimonial_picture name=”Professor Don Driscoll” details=”Director of Deakin University’s Centre for Integrative Ecology”]
Professor Don Driscoll[/testimonial_picture]

Professor Driscoll said there were major gaps related to monitoring governments, human population size, corruption, and threat-industries like residential development, agriculture, fossil fuel production and mining.

“Society can play a central role in influencing the trajectory of biodiversity,” he said.

“That can include things like beliefs and attitudes towards having large families, cultures of consumption, and willingness to boycott threat-industries.

“But none of these are covered in the convention’s indicators, and until you recognise where exactly the problem is you can’t start to solve it.”

Professor Driscoll said the large role governments played in moderating biodiversity loss was evident in the current discussion around construction of the Adani coal mine.

“In Australia, fossil fuel companies – who make substantial donations to Australian political parties – are attempting to develop new coal mines in the region immediately adjacent to the Great Barrier Reef, with substantial co-investment from government,” he said.

“If such new projects are prioritised by government, in preference to more sustainable energy production, we face a bigger threat from climate change and extreme weather events. And, in turn, extreme periods of high temperatures will further destroy coral reefs and jeopardise agricultural production.”

Co-author Euan Ritchie, an Associate Professor in Wildlife Ecology and Conservation in Deakin’s School of Life and Environmental Sciences, said the growing trend towards adversarial politics was also a big enemy of biodiversity protection.

“The two-party system is proving disastrous for Australia’s biodiversity. One party says they’ll take action on an environmental issue and the other takes an adversarial position, often by arguing jobs would be lost,” he said.

[testimonial_text]Our biodiversity is compromised in this political ping-pong, even though the best interest of the country, including jobs, is served by maintaining biodiversity.[/testimonial_text]
[testimonial_picture name=”Associate Professor Euan Ritchie” details=”Deakin University’s School of Life and Environmental Sciences”]
Associate Professor Euan Ritchie[/testimonial_picture]

But Associate Professor Ritchie said politics did offer individuals the greatest opportunity to have an impact on biodiversity protection in Australia.

“People should compare the environmental track records of political parties and hold them to account at election time,” he said.

“In Australia major political parties do respond strongly to swings against them. So it could just take one election where voters swing to parties with better environmental policies, for all politicians to start making conservation decisions in the national interest rather than for political point scoring.

“Importantly, as individuals, we can also reflect upon our own lifestyle choices and how this impacts the environment and future generations. Urgent change is required from across all of society.”

Read more:

Professor Don Driscoll discusses the Biodiversity Extinction Crisis

Published by Deakin Research on 27 March 2018

Are you a Deakin academic with a passion to share your research? You may be interested in writing for us.

Find out more